WillWybrow.com

You’ve come to the wrong place…

The Monarchy is Archaic

Posted in Chronicles, Politics, Science and Technology by Will Wybrow on August 14th, 2008

It’s very historical and fun and tourist-attracting, but it’s difficult to take the monarchy seriously anymore.

The Queen is purely a figurehead anyway. Things are decided by Parliament; I’m sure we all know that. There really is no point in having a Queen, other than it makes printing and minting money that much easier, since you never have to make a decision about what’s on the back of the coin.

The trouble is, we’ve come entirely too far to do anything about changing it. It would require nothing short of a flat-out revolution to change these things, and as far as I know, people are too frightened, lazy and contented to revolt these days.

If times were bad, everyone would love a revolution. But currently, the situation is that people are perfectly happy with the way things are. Everyone has their little complaints, but by far not enough to do anything about them (other than complain). Things are “ok” how they are, and that seems to be all that most of us need.

Of course, one revolutionary isn’t going to make a huge difference. We need lots and lots of people to kick things off, and I suspect that such a thing won’t happen in the Western world, ever. If nuclear war were pending then it might galvanise people into action. But nothing short of the threat of impending apocalypse is going to work.

Technocracy

But what if it did? Wouldn’t that be great? The space-race, nuclear war, chemical war, electronic war (Die Hard 4.0 style) or some other modern cause for panic that’s faster than global warming starts, and everybody goes crazy. What will happen? Well, if we’re lucky, people will turn to the scientists to protect them. If the populace gets desperate enough, they might turn to something they don’t understand to salvage their world. Presently, we are more than happy to elect leaders based on their persuasive words, not their persuasive qualifications. Tony Blair studied jurisprudence at Oxford. The theory and philosophy of law. What I want is a prime minister who studied physics or maths. Maybe the world would turn to men of science in its time of desperation.

With more and more parts of our lives being influenced by technological advances, why are we not searching for officials who excel in scientific fields? Get the right people and they can run the world like a well-oiled machine, not the festering ball of corruption and politics and war and religion that it is now. When we get to the fucking moon, do you think the astronauts are going to let just anyone come and live in their perfect new paradise? Fuck no! They’re going to let the war-mongers and the politicians and the bureaucrats and the kings and queens and the presidents all kill each other on Earth (or, as it will be referred to then, the Doomsphere) with their nukes and greenhouse effect while the Moonians (or maybe lunar-tics?) will instate a High Technocrat, a man of (computer) science and logic, to be the head of the state.

I vote: me.

4 Responses to 'The Monarchy is Archaic'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'The Monarchy is Archaic'.

  1. Ben said,

    on August 14th, 2008 at 7:43 am

    Lunar-tics! ^_^

    Also: you’re a very optimistic fellow. They’d turn to men of faith, not men of science. That’d be too logical.

  2. mrperson said,

    on August 14th, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    If you really wanted the country well run, you’d have a successful businessman run it.

  3. Will Wybrow said,

    on August 14th, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    Ben: yeah, maybe the Earthlings will turn to men of faith, but then I say all hasten to their inevitable demise. We Lunartics will only be scientists (because nobody will send preachers to the moon).

  4. Royalist said,

    on August 14th, 2008 at 9:28 pm

    I like the archaic touch of the Monarchy. Or to say it in the words of the US-greencard holder Hannes Stein recently wrote: “The Constitutional Monarchy is the most human, means the most adequate form of government for human beings that was ever invented - or to be more precise: that invented itself during the course of history.”
    http://debatte.welt.de/weblogs/715/nyc+tagebuch+einer+aus+und+einwanderung/84799/warum+ich+ein+europaeischer+reaktionaer+bin?req=RSS

    He wrote it in German: “Die konstitutionelle Monarchie ist ja die humanste, das heißt: dem Menschen am meisten angemessene Regierungsform, die je erfunden wurde, oder genauer gesagt: sich im Lauf der Geschichte von selbst erfunden hat.”

Leave a Reply